Legal Opinion

Baskin v. Hughes Realty, Inc.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 12, 2018No. B278580PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtManella, J.

*190In the underlying action for disability discrimination, appellant Tamara Baskin alleged that respondent Hughes Realty, Inc. (Hughes) violated the California Disabled *592Persons Act (DPA) ( Civ. Code, §§ 54 - 55.3.) by providing no designated and accessible path of travel for persons with disabilities within the parking lot of a grocery store.1 Specifically, she alleged that under the DPA, the store was obliged to designate an accessible path of travel from the street to the store's entrance that did not require wheelchair-bound patrons to travel behind parked vehicles. The trial court concluded…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Munson v. Del Taco, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Industrial Welfare Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Amtower v. Photon Dynamics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dwain Lammey v. Queenbee LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
  2. Flannery v. Murray CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Luis Villegas v. Villa Plaza Partnership, L.P.District Court, C.D. California · 2020
  4. Roe v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  5. Stand Up for California! v. U.S. Dept. of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API