General Mills, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1294Opinion
BRUINIERS, J.
Under California’s version of the Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act (UDITPA; Rev. & Tax. Code, § 25120 et seq.),1 the portion of a national or multinational company’s income that is subject to taxation in this state is determined by a formula that compares the company’s payroll, property and sales in this state to its total payroll, property and sales. When the standard formula does not fairly represent the extent of the company’s business in California, however, UDITPA also provides for application of a reasonable alternate formula in order to achieve an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Citizens Business Bank v. GevorgianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- State Tax Assessor v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company & Subsidiaries, Relator v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025