Microsoft Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
Ours is a global economy. In contrast, government and the taxing authority used to fund it are national and local. This geographic disparity generates difficulties when each jurisdiction seeks its piece of the economic pie, a pie generated by economic activity that knows no borders.
The Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act (UDITPA) 1 attempts to address these problems and fairly assess corporate taxes. Adopted by the District of Columbia and 22 states, including California, it seeks to establish uniform rules for the attribution of corporate income, rules that in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Frank Lyon Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Butler Bros. v. McColgan, Franchise Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Allied-Signal, Inc. Ex Rel. Bendix Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Lexin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Clayworth v. Pfizer, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
- Beal Bank, SSB v. Arter & Hadden, LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Scher v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- 926 N. Ardmore Ave., LLC v. Cnty. of L. A.California Supreme Court · 2017
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.