Legal Opinion
Bowe-Connor v. Shinseki
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 25, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2010-2032PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Shelia S. Bowe-Connor (“Bowe-Connor” or “plaintiff’) brings this action against Eric K. Shinseki, in his capacity as the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, (“Secretary” or “defendant”) alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VTI”). Defendant has moved to dismiss or alternatively for summary judgment. For the reasons explained below, the Court will grant defendant’s motion.
BACKGROUND
The facts and background of the case are set forth fully in this Court’s prior opinion. See…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Demissie v. Starbucks Corporate Office and HeadquartersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Byrd v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Dick v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Redding v. MattisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Brett v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.