Legal Opinion
Byrd v. Vilsack
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 18, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2010-1809PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Anita Byrd (“Byrd”) works as an Information Technology Specialist in the United States Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (“NRCS”). She brings this action against Tom Vilsack, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, alleging that she was discriminated against on account of her race (African American) and retaliated against, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq. This matter is presently before the Court on the Department’s Motion for…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Burton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Ramsey v. MonizDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Walker v. McCarthyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Saunders v. MillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Redmon v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.