Legal Opinion
Brett v. Brennan
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 19, 2018No. Case No. 1:15–cv–01613 (TNM)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Because exhaustion is jurisdictional, Mr. Brett bears the burden of showing that he raised these allegations at the administrative level. Georgiades , 729 F.2d at 833 n.4. Mr. Brett's opposition does not satisfy this burden. With respect to his claim that Mr. Trent lodged false allegations against him, Mr. Brett's opposition argues that he had a right to raise this claim in administrative proceedings and that he attempted to raise a related claim about being suspended as a result of Mr. Trent's allegations. Opp. to Mot. Dismiss, 29-30. In support of this claim, Mr. Brett cites a letter that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Baloch v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- American Wildlands v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Lurensky v. WellinghoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ayo-Aghimien II v. Attorney General of the United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Brett v. BrennanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Congress v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Robb v. PerdueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Sharp v. PerdueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022