Legal Opinion
Demissie v. Starbucks Corporate Office and Headquarters
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 25, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-2002PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge
Rahel Demissie, an Ethiopian-born plaintiff proceeding pro se, has sued Starbucks Corporate Office and Headquarters (“Starbucks”), alleging that the company violated Title VII by failing to “equally apply [its] rules and regulations” regarding pay raises and work scheduling “to all employees based on race, gender or national origin” and by retaliating against her for “reporting] the situation” to human resources. (Compl., Nov. 4, 2013 [Dkt. No. 1] at 3.) Before the Court is defendant’s partial motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Soon Y. Park v. Howard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Rattigan v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Redmon v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Kirwa v. U.S. Dep't of Def.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Aston v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Carter v. CarsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Slovinec v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.