Legal Opinion

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Boelter

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1999No. 09213-3PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

Attorney Arthur H. Boelter appeals the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) Disciplinary Board’s recommendation to this court that he receive a six-month suspension from the practice of law due to three counts of misconduct. The alleged misconduct arose out of a fee dispute between Boelter and a client, Robert Withey. The Board found that Boelter threatened to reveal Withey’s confidences in a suit to collect fees and falsely claimed that a disclosable tape recording of a conference with Withey existed. It also found that the amount Withey was billed for the legal services was unreasonable.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Matter of DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaskellWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against HaskellWashington Supreme Court · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against KuvaraWashington Supreme Court · 2003

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API