In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Chase
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The accused was convicted of attempted possession of a controlled substance, a misdemeanor. ORS 475.992(4)(b) and ORS 161.405(1). The Bar brought these disciplinary proceedings alleging that the misdemeanor involved moral turpitude. ORS 9.527(2) (set forth infra).1 Two members of the Trial Board concluded that the crime did not involve moral turpitude. The other member dissented. The Disciplinary Review Board was also divided and by a four to three vote found the crime to be one involving moral turpitude and recommended a public reprimand.
The following facts are set out here from the Trial…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hunter v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Ricco v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re FaheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re BerkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Committee on Legal Ethics v. SixWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Matter of MarquardtArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re RowellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.