Blanck v. Commonwealth Amusement Corp.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order granting a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. ' The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Edgar C. Levey, George M. Lipman, and Daniel C. Deasy, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
These actions were instituted by the plaintiffs therein for the foreclosure of fifteen mechanics’ liens claimed by the several plaintiffs for materials furnished in the construction of a theater building, erected by the defendant upon a certain lot of land in the city and county of San Francisco. The five actions were consolidated in the court below, and judgment rendered therein in favor of the plaintiffs. The appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying the defendant a new trial.
The building in question was erected by the defendant upon leased ground in accordance with the terms…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Underhill v. Santa Barbara Land, Building, & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Bryson v. McConeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Hinckley v. Field's Biscuit & Cracker Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- John A. Roebling's Sons Co. v. Humboldt Electric Light & Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Callahan v. Chatsworth Park, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Distefano v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Bell v. StadlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
- Jarvis v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Olson-Mahoney Lumber Co. v. Dunne Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.