Legal Opinion

Jarvis v. Frey

California Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1917No. L. A. No. 4034PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The appellant, Universal Lumber & Mill Company, was a party to and cross-complainant in a consolidated action to enforce the payment of certain mechanics’ liens. Defendant Frey was the owner, defendant Campbell the original contractor, and defendant and respondent Pacific Surety Company, a corporation, was the surety upon the contractor’s undertaking, conditioned on the faithful performance by him of his contract, and binding the surety, should Campbell fail to do so, to pay for any materials or supplies furnished for and in the performance of his contract. The undertaking provided “that all…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. NugentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Harmon v. San Francisco & San Rafael RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Star Mill and Lumber Co. v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. Russ Lumber & Mill Co. v. GarrettsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Continental Building & Loan Ass'n v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Chatsworth Park, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Miller v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Peccole v. Luce & Goodfellow, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Wand Corp. v. San Gabriel Valley Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Shafer v. Los Serranos Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API