Legal Opinion

Bryson v. McCone

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1898No. L. A. No. 279PublishedCited by 28 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Walter Van Dyke, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract to convert the iceworks of the Consumers’ Ice Company at Los Angeles into the Kitton system of ice making, to be located at Biverside, and to furnish certain materials. The work was to be done and the materials furnished according to specifications, describing with apparent minuteness what was to be done. Generally, they were to take down and remove to their shop the old machinery, and were to set the new machinery up at Biverside so as to make a complete' ice plant.

Among the things to be furnished by defendants were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. W.T. Filer v. . New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Dunn v. . SteubingNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Hawthorne v. SiegelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Theisen v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Continental Life Ins. Co. v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Southern California Disinfecting Co. v. LomkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API