Olson-Mahoney Lumber Co. v. Dunne Investment Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Fourteen separate complaints were filed to enforce mechanics and materialmen’s liens, and by order of the court were consolidated and tried in one action. The plaintiffs in eleven of these several complaints are respondents and the appeal is here under the above title. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs and from this judgment defendants appeal.
Defendants Condon and McGlynn were the contractors for the work; certain named persons defendants were owners of the property on which the building in question was erected, and defendant Dunne Investment Company was the owner of a lease…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Shively v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Schaghticoke Powder Co. v. Greenwich & Johnsonville Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Barker & Stewart Lumber Co. v. Marathon Paper Mills Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Giant Powder Co. v. San Diego Flume Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Martin v. DellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Tyler v. J. I. Mitrovich Bldg. Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Arata & Peters, Inc. v. Snow Mountain Water & Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Consolidated Lumber Co. v. Bosworth, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.