Legal Opinion

Pracuta v. Alex C. Ferguson Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided October 28, 1941No. 477Published

1Opinion of the Court

Sloane, J.,

The additional defendants move that the decree joining them be vacated and that they be dropped from the record. They objected to their joinder once before, but joinder was allowed on order of Judge Bok. They again come, and ground their motions on the contention that no claim against them appears of record.

Plaintiff, a stevedore, brought this action to recover damages for injuries from caustic soda which got out of defective drums he was handling. In his statement *319of claim he alleges that the soda was manufactured or purchased and packed by one of the three original defendants,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Vinnacombe v. Phila. Am. S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Koontz v. Messer & Quaker State Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Rau v. MankoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Rudman Et Ux. v. City of ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API