Legal Opinion

Rudman Et Ux. v. City of Scranton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1934No. Appeal 38PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

Simon Rudman and Bertha Rudman, his wife, brought an action in trespass against the City of Scranton for damages resulting from personal injuries sustained August 22, 1932, by Bertha Rudman, and in their statement of claim alleged that the city was negligent in that it allowed and permitted a hole, depression, or defect, which caused the injury, to remain in a public highway. The suit was instituted on February 20, 1933, and on March 4, 1933, the defendant filed a praecipe for a sci. fa. to bring in the Spring Brook "Water Service Company as an additional defendant,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Vinnacombe v. Phila. Am. S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Noonan v. PardeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. First Nat. Bk. of Pittsburgh v. BairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. McDevitt v. People's Nat. Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Bausewine v. Norristown Herald, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Med-Mar, Inc. v. DILWORTHSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Kitchener v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API