Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners v. Miller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 7, 1907No. Nos. 15,258-(196)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Itasca county, McClenahaU} J., overruling their demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff and respondent to recover of the defendants and appellants three separate amounts under causes of action numbered, respectively, 1, 2, and 3. Plaintiff is the board of county commissioners of Itasca County, Minnesota. The defendants are, respectively, the former treasurer and his bondsmen. From an order overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, this appeal was taken.

The pleading of first cause of action is at once a brief on the law concerning the duties of the county treasurer, and a bill of particulars setting forth in great detail the facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. State v. BobleterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Schmitt v. HagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Trebby v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. ElmundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rye v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Albers v. FitschenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Mercer v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  4. State v. TupaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Marotta v. Iroquois Realty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API