Legal Opinion
State v. Tupa
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 24, 1935No. 30,429PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
The county attorney of McLeod county presented to the district court of that county an information charging the defendant with the crime of being an accessory after the fact to a felony in violation of 2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 9918, which reads:
“Every person not standing in the relation of husband or wife, parent or child, to the offender, who, after the commission of a felony, shall harbor, conceal, or aid such offender, with intent that he may avoid or escape from arrest, trial, conviction, or punishment, having knowledge or reasonable ground to believe that such…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Biddinger v. Commissioner of Police of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Brasie v. Minneapolis Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- West v. HennesseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Thompson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. KohutNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- In Re the Civil Commitment of GiemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Engstrom v. FARMERS & BANKERS LIFE INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Pettibone v. Cook County, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.