Albers v. Fitschen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an appeal by the defendant, Louis Fitschen, from a judgment in the district court for the plaintiff, Henry Albers, enforcing payment of a commission allegedly due under an agreement to sell real estate.
It appears from the record that plaintiff’s efforts were the producing cause of the sale of a farm owned by defendant, and that the defendant has failed to pay a broker’s commission pursuant to an agreement. The plaintiff failed to allege, as required by Minn. St. 82.16, subd. 2, 1 that he was a licensed real estate broker. No objection was made to the defect in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McShane v. QuillinIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Schmitt v. HagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Lobstein v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Hardwick v. IcklerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Board of County Commissioners v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Biesterfeld v. Asbestos Corp. of AmericaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Nodland v. ChirpichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Christenson v. Argonaut Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.