Schmitt v. Hager
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Brown county by plaintiff, as trustee in bankruptcy for Fred Hager, bankrupt, to vacate, as being in fraud of creditors, a transfer of real estate made by defendant Fred Hager to defendant Mary Hager, his wife. Defendant Hager alone appeared and answered. The case was tried before Webber, J., who found in favor of-plaintiff. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, defendants Hager appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is an action by the trustee in bankruptcy of the defendant Fred Hager against him and his codefendants to set aside a conveyance to his wife because fraudulent as to his creditors.
The complaint, besides other allegations, alleges these facts: Fred Hager on October 27, 1893, was indebted to O. H. Hornburg *414in the sum of $530, due November 1,1894, and on March 9, 1896, he duly recovered and docketed a judgment against Hager for the balance of such indebtedness then unpaid. No part of the judgment has been paid. On October 27, 1894, Hager and his wife conveyed certain real estate owned by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brasie v. Minneapolis Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Duxbury v. BoiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Morrill v. Little Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- First National Bank v. StraitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Humphrey v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rye v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Brockman v. BrockmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Albers v. FitschenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Cantieny v. BozeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Downer v. Union Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.