Taber v. Beske
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant.
The complaint , sets forth a cause of action to recover possession of a certain lot in Los Angeles. The defendant filed a cross-complaint alleging title in herself making John T. Dennison and C. C. Horsford parties thereto and praying that Taber, Dennison, and Horsford be compelled to convey the said lot to her, and for general relief. Judgment was given in her favor declaring her to be the owner of the lot in fee, that she was owing Taber $840 for money expended by him for the benefit, of the lot and providing that upon payment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fair v. StevenotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Scheerer v. CuddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Dreyfus v. HirtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Beattie v. CrewdsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Bryan v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hunt v. L. M. Field, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Siegel v. Boston (In Re Sale Guaranty Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Berkowitz v. the Kiener Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Monnette v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- J. R. Garrett Co. v. StatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.