Berkowitz v. the Kiener Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs sued to recover moneys alleged to be due to them and defendant Elliott M. Bank from defendants, The Kiener Company and Harry Kiener, for commissions due under the terms of a written contract entered into between the defendant, The Kiener Company, and plaintiffs, and defendant, Elliott M. Bank, while doing business under the fictitious name of Sutton & Co. and also on an oral contract between the defendant, The Kiener Company, and plaintiffs, while plaintiffs were doing business under the name of Berkowitz Brothers.
Plaintiffs sought recovery upon the common…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Arnold v. SkaggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- People v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Estate of BainbridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Lawrence v. Pickwick Stages, Northern Division, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Bliss v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Langdon v. LangdonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Montaldo v. Hires Bottling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.