Legal Opinion

Gamble v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 18, 2018No. Case No. 17-cv-06621-YGRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The SAC alleges that, beginning in 1997, Gamble worked in Kaiser's Human Resources department. Gamble alleges that she was denied promotions and subjected to a pattern and practice of discrimination, despite her qualifications and excellent performance. (SAC ¶ 44.) She alleges she also was subjected to harassment and unreasonable scrutiny by the person who began supervising her in July 2012, Rosa Grajeda. (Id. ¶¶ 43-44.) Gamble asserts that Grajeda and Kaiser determined to terminate her under false pretenses, and ultimately terminated her on July 29, 2014. (Id. ¶¶ 45, 46.)

Kennedy began…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. General Building Contractors Assn., Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. (PS) Henreid v. HaynesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  2. (PS) Henreid v. HaynesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  3. Adams v. Community Housing PartnershipDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  4. Adrienne Hankins v. Dentons US LLP, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  5. Avenmarg v. Humboldt CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API