Avenmarg v. Humboldt County
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 DEBRA AVENMARG, Case No. 19-cv-05891-RMI 9 Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANT 10 v. HUMBOLDT COUNTY'S SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS 11 HUMBOLDT COUNTY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 61 12 Defendants. 13 14 Now pending before the court is a Motion to Dismiss (dkt. 61) filed by Defendant 15 Humboldt County seeking dismissal from Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) (dkt. 16 57-1, 57-2 *SEALED*)1 without further leave to amend. Plaintiff has responded (dkt. 63), and the 17 County has replied (dkt. 66). For the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.