Legal Opinion

Avenmarg v. Humboldt County

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 4, 2020No. 1:19-cv-05891Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 DEBRA AVENMARG, Case No. 19-cv-05891-RMI 9 Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANT 10 v. HUMBOLDT COUNTY'S SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS 11 HUMBOLDT COUNTY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 61 12 Defendants. 13 14 Now pending before the court is a Motion to Dismiss (dkt. 61) filed by Defendant 15 Humboldt County seeking dismissal from Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) (dkt. 16 57-1, 57-2 *SEALED*)1 without further leave to amend. Plaintiff has responded (dkt. 63), and the 17 County has replied (dkt. 66). For the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API