Legal Opinion

(PS) Henreid v. Haynes

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 18, 2025No. 2:23-cv-02797Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL HENREID, No. 2:23-cv-2797-DJC-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 RAYMOND NEAL HAYNES, DAVID SOTELO, and RICHARD SKAGGS, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Paul Henreid is proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred to the 19 undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff is 20 effectively seeking to relitigate in federal court a defamation lawsuit that he pursued and lost in 21 state court. Pending before the undersigned is a…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API