(PS) Henreid v. Haynes
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL HENREID, No. 2:23-cv-2797-DJC-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND AMENDED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 RAYMOND NEAL HAYNES, DAVID SOTELO, and RICHARD SKAGGS, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Paul Henreid is proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred to the 19 undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending 20 before the undersigned is a joint motion by Defendants Richard Skaggs and Raymond Haynes to 21 dismiss this action for failure to state a…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.