Amador Valley Investors v. City of Livermore
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (H. C.), J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the Amador Valley Investors (hereinafter Amador) for damages in the sum of $93,182.14 resulting from the discharge of treated sewage water into a creek which flowed through Amador’s property.'
The trial court found in relevant part as follows: Since 1964, Amador has been the owner of some 300 acres of land in the Livermore Valley of Alameda County on which it proposed to construct a number of homes. The Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, in order to protect against flooding, required Amador to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
- Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Soliman v. Philip Morris IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Leaf v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Michelson v. HamadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Sumner Peck Ranch, Inc. v. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
- Ocean Services Corp. v. Ventura Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.