Legal Opinion

Amador Valley Investors v. City of Livermore

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1974No. Civ. 32004PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN (H. C.), J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the Amador Valley Investors (hereinafter Amador) for damages in the sum of $93,182.14 resulting from the discharge of treated sewage water into a creek which flowed through Amador’s property.'

The trial court found in relevant part as follows: Since 1964, Amador has been the owner of some 300 acres of land in the Livermore Valley of Alameda County on which it proposed to construct a number of homes. The Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, in order to protect against flooding, required Amador to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Soliman v. Philip Morris IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Leaf v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Michelson v. HamadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Sumner Peck Ranch, Inc. v. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
  5. Ocean Services Corp. v. Ventura Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API