Michelson v. Hamada
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
Introduction
Defendant and appellant James S. Hamada, M.D. (Hamada) and plaintiff and respondent G. Karlin Michelson, M.D. (Michelson), both of whom practice orthopedic surgery, entered into several agreements providing that Hamada would share his office facilities with Michelson and provide certain billing and other services through his office personnel in exchange for payment. Michelson came to believe that Hamada was diverting moneys due Michelson for professional services rendered to patients, and he filed a complaint alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Wolf v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Altavion, Inc. v. Konica Minolta System Laboratory, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.