Legal Opinion

Michelson v. Hamada

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1994No. B049598PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

Introduction

Defendant and appellant James S. Hamada, M.D. (Hamada) and plaintiff and respondent G. Karlin Michelson, M.D. (Michelson), both of whom practice orthopedic surgery, entered into several agreements providing that Hamada would share his office facilities with Michelson and provide certain billing and other services through his office personnel in exchange for payment. Michelson came to believe that Hamada was diverting moneys due Michelson for professional services rendered to patients, and he filed a complaint alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Wolf v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. American Airlines, Inc. v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Altavion, Inc. v. Konica Minolta System Laboratory, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API