Legal Opinion

One Buick Car v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 2, 1920No. 9776PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from County Court, Jefferson County; E. L. Dillard, Judge. Forfeiture of one Buick car under provisions of the prohibition law, and B. F. Cline, owner, who intervened, brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was a proceeding commenced for the purpose of forfeiting to the state one Buick automobile upon the ground that at the time it was seized it was being used to convey intoxicating liquors in violation of the prohibition laws of the state of Oklahoma. Upon trial below judgment for forfeiture was rendered as prayed for, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.

In this court the attorney general confesses error as follows:

“The judgment of the lower court, forfeiting this automobile, is attacked on two grounds: First, that it was an interstate transportation of intoxicating…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. One Hudson Super-Six Automobile v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peavler v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Fleming Automobile Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Sturm Motor Car Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API