Legal Opinion
One Ford Car v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 24, 1923No. 14138PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEPHENSON, C. J.
D. Holland, the duly elected- and acting county attorney of Cleveland county, in the name of the state of Oklahoma, informed against one Ford car, in the county court, to forfeit the property for alleged violation of the prohibitory law. W. B. Wild intervened in said cause, alleging that he was the owner of the ear, and that it had not been used in violation of the provisions of section 7023, Compiled Statutes of 1921. The cause was submitted for trial in the county court at the January, 1923, term of the court, in which judgment was entered against the car for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hoskins v. State Ex Rel. CrowderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Peavler v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Hatfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commercial Credit Co. v. State Ex Rel.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Gmac v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- One Ford Touring Car v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Kirk v. State ex rel. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951