Legal Opinion
Drulard v. LeTourneau
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1979No. TC A76-07-10279, SC 25634PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.
This is a suit to enjoin the alleged violation of building restrictions in a platted subdivision in Portland by the construction of a house which impaired the view from plaintiffs’ house. Plaintiffs appeal from a decree denying relief. We affirm.
The building restrictions include the following provision:
"No residential building shall be erected, or permitted to remain on any lot in said addition, having more than one story above the level of the street upon which such building fronts, or exceeding 24 feet above the middle point of the front line of such lot, or having a roof pitch exceeding a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Thompson v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
- State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. SevierOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Frankland v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- McDonough v. WW Snow Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. MeienbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Staley v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Albright v. FishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Glover v. SantangeloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Leonard v. StoeblingNevada Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.