Legal Opinion

FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. Meienberg

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 30, 2007No. 2 CA-CV 2006-0092PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Jeffrey Meienberg appeals from an order issuing a mandatory injunc tion 1 requiring him to reduce the height of a hangar he had built. He argues the trial court erred by concluding Meienberg’s violation of a restrictive covenant was intentional, failing to apply the doctrine of relative hardships, and failing to re-open the case for additional evidence regarding the hardship Meienberg would incur in complying with the injunction. He also argues that appellee Flying Diamond Airpark, LLC, was estopped from enforcing the covenant. Finding no error, we…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  3. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Reserve Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Decker v. HendricksArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Sandstrom v. LarsenHawaii Supreme Court · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. McCloud v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Duckstein v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Lowe v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Sholes v. FernandoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API