Legal Opinion

Staley v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 26, 2000No. 96-4789; CA A101516PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Defendants built their home in a way that partially blocked plaintiff’s ocean view. Plaintiff sued alleging, among other things, breach of an express contract, breach of an implied contract, and fraud. The trial court entered judgment in plaintiffs favor on the implied contract claim and in defendants’ favor on the express contract and fraud claims. Defendants appeal and plaintiff cross-appeals. We affirm on both the appeal and the cross-appeal.

Because this case arises on defendants’ motion for a directed verdict and their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, we state the facts in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schafer v. Fraser Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Hay v. Oregon Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bixler v. First Nat. Bank of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Frankland v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Jaqua v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. MilesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Jackson v. MorseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  4. Global Executive Management Solutions, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2017
  5. Mindful Insights, LLC v. VerifyValid, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API