Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Smith

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 7, 1957No. 311PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

By a complaint to the court of chancery for Chittenden County, the plaintiffs asked that court to enjoin the construction of a motel by the defendants in the Town of South Burlington. The effort of the plaintiffs to invoke equitable relief is founded on the provisions of the protective zoning ordinance of the Town of South Burlington, dated June 7, 1947 as amended March 1, 1952. The chancellor’s findings and reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom establish these factors to the final decree that followed.

The plaintiffs Thompson are husband and wife and own certain land which they have…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Electrical Fittings Corp. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Santo v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
  3. Board of Zoning Appeals v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  4. Heath v. M. C.C. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  5. Jackson v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Chioffi v. Winooski Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. Krupp v. KruppSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  3. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  4. Smith v. Winhall Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  5. In Re Appeal of GadhueSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API