Legal Opinion

Leonard v. Stoebling

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1986No. 16289PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This action was originally brought by the Leonards and Morrows seeking a mandatory injunction for violation of the restrictive covenants protecting the Marina Highland Estates subdivision and for the breach of a personal agreement not to build on a portion of a building lot. Appellants allege that Stoebling’s structure was wrongfully approved by the Marina Highland Estates’ Architectural Control Committee and that this approval was unreasonable, arbitrary and in bad faith.

Leonard and Morrow filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief seeking to define their rights under the…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Kite Hill Community Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Drulard v. LeTourneauOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Burroughs Corp. v. Century Steel, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Memory Gardens of Las Vegas, Inc. v. Pet Ponderosa Memorial Gardens, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Glover v. SantangeloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Dixon v. ThatcherNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Grovenburg v. Rustle Meadow Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  5. Lee v. Verex Assurance, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API