Legal Opinion

Glover v. Santangelo

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 7, 1984No. 81-313-1; CA A28301PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals the issuance of a mandatory injunction which ordered him to tear down his house because it obstructed plaintiffs’ view in violation of a restrictive covenant. After de novo review we affirm, but we remand for consideration of alternatives to razing the encroaching structure.

Plaintiffs and defendant are the owners of adjacent parcels of real property in Klamath Falls. Both lots are on a hillside overlooking Mt. Shasta, Lake Ewana and the downtown area. Defendant’s lot is on the downhill side of plaintiffs’ lot and is encumbered by a restrictive covenant which benefits…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duester v. AlvinOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Tauscher v. AndrussOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Oliver v. Skinner and LodgeOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Alloway v. MoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Drulard v. LeTourneauOregon Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Leonard v. StoeblingNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Taylor v. McCollomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Stone v. CCXL, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. Levasseur v. ArmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Vossen v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API