Legal Opinion
Miller v. Price
California Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 10217PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
Respondents move to dismiss the appeal from the judgment on the ground that no transcript of the record, certified to be correct by the clerk of the court below, or the attorneys, has been filed here within the time required by rule II of this court, and that no proceeding, either for the settlement of a bill of exceptions, or for the preparation of a transcript under the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, is pending or may yet be instituted.
Judgment for the defendants on the pleadings was given and filed July 1, 1927. It was docketed and entered July 8, and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Locke Paddon v. Locke PaddonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Hind v. Oriental Products Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Crocker v. CrockerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Jaques v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. LesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Benson v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Charles v. City of Crescent CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Peak v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Security-First National Bank v. BixbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.