Hume v. Lindholm

The defendant has appealed from the judgment rendered against him and from an order denying his motion to set aside the judgment. Because of another appeal by plaintiff, it may avoid confusion if we refer to" the parties to this appeal as plaintiff and defendant.

The action is for money due on contract. A decision was announced by the trial court in favor of plaintiff on submission of the case on May 23, 1922, and plaintiff’s attor neys were directed to prepare findings. The decision announced from the bench was “in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum claimed.” The sum…