Brown County Bank v. Hage
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action by the payee against the maker of two promissory notes for $3,400 each, both executed and delivered August 19, 1916. There was a verdict for defendant, and from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.
There are two defenses: One, that there was no consideration for the notes, or that the consideration, such as it was, failed absolutely; and the other, that the execution and delivery of the notes was procured through duress.
It will be convenient to refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff is a banking…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Central Bank v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
- Joannin v. OgilvieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- De Graff v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Fargusson v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Snyder v. SamuelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American National Bank v. HellingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Meylink v. Minnehaha Co-Operative Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- Cannon Falls Holding Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Zimmermann v. BenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Young v. St. Paul Publishers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.