Legal Opinion

Brown County Bank v. Hage

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 13, 1923No. 23,536PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action by the payee against the maker of two promissory notes for $3,400 each, both executed and delivered August 19, 1916. There was a verdict for defendant, and from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

There are two defenses: One, that there was no consideration for the notes, or that the consideration, such as it was, failed absolutely; and the other, that the execution and delivery of the notes was procured through duress.

It will be convenient to refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff is a banking…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Central Bank v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
  2. Joannin v. OgilvieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. De Graff v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Fargusson v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. Snyder v. SamuelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. HellingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Meylink v. Minnehaha Co-Operative Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Cannon Falls Holding Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Zimmermann v. BenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Young v. St. Paul Publishers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API