De Graff v. County of Ramsey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant, as trustee under the will of Charles A. De Graff, deceased, from an order of the district court for Eamsey county, refusing a new trial after a trial before Brill, J., and judgment ordered for defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
Plaintiff was the executor of the last will and testament of Charles A. De Graff, which was probated in the probate court in the county of Eamsey. ITe filed an inventory and appraisement of the estate. Thereupon the probate judge informed him that *320under the provisions of Laws 1875, c. 37, as amended by Laws 1885, c. 103, — which amendment was since declared unconstitutional, State v. Gorman, 40 Minn. 232, (41 N. W. Rep. 948,) — it was necessary, before proceeding further in the administration, that he should pay into the county treasury $1,000, and file in the probate court a receipt…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Davidson v. GormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- State ex rel. McCardy v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Fargusson v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Mearkle v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ward v. ScarboroughTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Joannin v. OgilvieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Greenough v. Prairie Dog Ranch, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Capps v. HensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Pettibone v. Cook County, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.