Legal Opinion

Meylink v. Minnehaha Co-Operative Oil Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1938No. File No. 8119PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Plaintiff alleged that defendant had coerced him into paying defendant the sum of one thousand dollars by threatening to prosecute plaintiff’s son for embezzlement. The issues made up by these allegations and defendant’s denials were submitted to a jury. The verdict was for plaintiff. Thereafter the court entered judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict, upon grounds which had been urged by defendant in a motion for a directed verdict made at the conclusion of the testimony. The appeal of the plaintiff requires us to review the evidence in order that we may determine whether the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eureka Bank v. BaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Tiffany & Co. v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Wolff v. StengerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Wolff v. BluhmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Meyer v. Guardian Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lukens v. ZavadilSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hullander v. McIntyreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Erck v. BachandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Raebel v. Fishers Grove Golf Course, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. McGillivray v. SiedschlawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API