Legal Opinion

Cannon Falls Holding Co. v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 16, 1931No. 28,606PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

In this action by a holder for value but not in due course against the makers of two promissory notes, the verdict was for defendants. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

The facts are simple and for the most part not in serious controversy. Defendants are respectively the widow and a son of Mr. P. A. Peterson, late a resident of Cannon Falls, who departed this life August 20, 1924. For some years he had been president of the Peoples State Bank of Cannon Falls and treasurer of the Scandinavian Benevolent Society. After his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Skelton v. GrimmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Maguire v. MaguireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Stevenson v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Brown County Bank v. HageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Reed v. LammelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bakke v. KellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Wojtkowski v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. In Re Estate of NygrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. Fidelity State Bank v. BradleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Phelps v. Aurora State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API