Legal Opinion
Goldkind v. Snider Bros., Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 23, 1983No. 82-1027PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Appellants contest two orders of the trial court, one granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment and the other denying appellants’ motion for leave to amend their cross-claim. The underlying claim on which the cross-claim is based was before this court in Henderson v. Snider Brothers, Inc., 439 A.2d 481 (D.C.1981) (en banc). The facts in the instant case are largely the same as in Henderson. We affirm the denial of the motion for leave to amend, but we reverse the award of summary judgment and remand the case for further proceedings.
I
In February 1973 six doctors…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Exxon Corporation v. Texas Motor Exchange of Houston, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Vassiliades v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Arthur Young & Co. v. SutherlandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Blake Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hollins v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.