Legal Opinion
Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 12, 1984No. 83-885PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Associate Judge:
In this appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee and the denial of appellants’ motion to reconsider that order, we hold that appellants’ motion for reconsideration was filed under Superior Court Civil Rule 59(e), and that the motion was timely since Rule 6(e) is applicable to Rule 59(e) motions and each period of time under those rules is to be considered separately in computing time under Rule 6(a). Thus, appellants’ notice of appeal from the denial of the motion was timely. Upon review of the record, we find no abuse of discretion by the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- United States v. DieterSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- D.D. v. M.T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Bible Way Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ of Apostolic Faith of Washington v. BeardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Lynch v. Meridian Hill Studio Apts., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Starling v. Jephunneh Lawrence & AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Mills v. Aetna Fire Underwriters InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.