Legal Opinion
Hollins v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 12, 2000No. 97-CV-538PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Appellant Leon Hollins sued his former employer, Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA” or “Fannie Mae”), for discrimination and retaliation under the District of Columbia Human Rights Act, D.C.Code §§ 1-2501 et seq. (1996) (“DCHRA”). 1 In his complaint Mr. Hol-lins also included claims for breach of contract, wrongful discharge, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Before discovery was complete, but after Hollins had an opportunity to substantiate his claims, the trial court granted Fannie Mae’s motion for summary judgment. On appeal Mr. Hollins…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Futrell v. Department of Labor Federal Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Griffin v. Acacia Life InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Estenos v. PAHO/WHO Federal Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- McFarland v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Elhusseini v. Compass Group USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.