Legal Opinion

Western Steel Casting Co. v. Edland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1936No. 26168. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

On April 27, 1934, Edward L. Edland entered into a contract with the state of Washington, whereby he agreed to “do all work and furnish all tools, materials and equipment for manufacturing and stockpiling crushed stone (oil rock) materials” on a state highway to be constructed in King and Pierce counties. Among others, the contract contained the following provision:

“The term ‘materials’ as used herein includes, in addition to materials incorporated in the project used or to be used in the operation thereof, equipment and other materials used and/or consumed in the performances of the work.”

Wit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. Bratnober Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Puget Sound State Bank v. GallucciWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. United States Rubber Co. of California v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Clatsop County ex rel. Hildebrand v. FeldschauOregon Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Illinois State Toll Highway Commission Ex Rel. Patten Tractor & Equipment Co. v. M. J. Boyle & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  2. L. J. Dowell, Inc. v. United Pacific Casualty InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. H. Earl Clack Co. v. StauntonMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. In Re Leon Keyser, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1952
  5. Alexander Thomson, Inc. v. B. Perini & Sons, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API