Puget Sound State Bank v. Gallucci
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered November 26, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
—
The plaintiff bank seeks recovery from the defendants upon three bonds, executed by the defendant Gallucci, as principal, and the defendant surety company, as surety, to secure debts incurred by Gallucci in the performance of the work of three contracts entered into between him and the city of Tacoma for the construction of three local improvements for the city. The bonds were executed in com*447pliance with the act of 1909, entitled “An Act requiring bonds from contractors contracting to do public work, conditioned to pay laborers, mechanics, materialmen and others.” Laws of 1909, p. 716; Rem.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- National Surety Co. v. Bratnober Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Smith v. BowmanUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- Standard Boiler Works v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Godeffroy v. CaldwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Duke v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Southern Surety Co. v. SchlesingerOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Sturtevant Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Washington National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.