Legal Opinion

Alexander Thomson, Inc. v. B. Perini & Sons, Inc.

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 12, 1941No. File 61004Published

1Opinion of the CourtCornell, J.

For the most part, the material facts are not in dispute. It is disclosed that on June 1, 1937, a written agreement was executed by the defendant, B. Perini & Sons, Inc. (hereinafter called the principal contractor), with the Metropolitan District (which is a municipal corporation having its territorial limits in the County of Hartford, in this State, hereinafter referred to as the “District”), by the provisions of which the former undertook to “do all the work and furnish all the materials, tools and appliances.... necessary or proper for performing the work. ...” of completing the Bills…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. United States v. HodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API