United States Rubber Co. of California v. American Bonding Co. of Baltimore
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Easterday, J., entered April 29, 1914, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action upon an indemnity bond.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
In July, 1911, the city of Tacoma entered into a contract with the Washington Engineering Company, by the terms of which the engineering company undertook to erect for the use of the public a vertical lift steel bridge across the Puyallup river. As required by § 1159 of Rem. & Bal. Code (P. C. 309 § 93), the city took from the contractor a bond, with the American Bonding Company of Baltimore, as surety, conditioned that the contractor should “pay all laborers, mechanics and subcontractors and materialmen, and all persons who shall supply such person or persons, or subcontractors, with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. Bratnober Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Standard Boiler Works v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Hurley-Mason Co. v. American Bonding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Gate City Lumber Co. v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- National Lumber & Box Co. v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Benson Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Sanders CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. California-Arizona Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Day & Maddock Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.