Legal Opinion

H. Earl Clack Co. v. Staunton

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1937No. 7,664PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE ANUS TM AN

delivered the opinion of the court.

This action was tried to the court without a jury. The court found for defendants and the plaintiff appealed from the judgment. The facts are these:

Defendant Staunton entered into a written contract with the state, acting through the highway commission, to construct a certain designated highway in Toole county. The contract, so far as material on the point we are now to consider, contained these provisions:

“The contractor further covenants and agrees that he will well and truly pay all laborers, mechanics, subcontractors and material…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shea v. North-Butte Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Esterly v. Broadway Garage Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Anaconda Copper Min. Co. v. Ravalli CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Cascade Construction Co. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Rachow v. Philbrick & NicholsonWashington Supreme Court · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hoehne v. Sherrodd, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. Modern Motor Co. v. H & K Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Treasure State Industries, Inc. v. LeiglandMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Campbell v. MahoneyMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Rothwell v. Allstate InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API