OLIVER v. Clairton
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Horace Steen,
The original plaintiff, Matthew P. Oliver, is the owner of two lots of ground in the City of Clairton. The Planning Commission of that city certified as “blighted” a certain area which included his land; it transmitted this information to the Redevelopment Authority and to the City Council. The Authority prepared a redevelopment proposal and executed a redevelopment contract with the Pennsylvania Industrial Chemical Corporation as Redeveloper; the Planning Commission having approved the proposal, the Authority submitted it to the City Council together…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schenck v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
3Cited by38 opinions
- Blumenschein v. Pittsburgh Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Gohld Realty Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Recht v. Clairton Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- State Ex Inf. Dalton v. Land Clearance for Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.